Recent Wade's Wire Posts

Following are links to recent posts to Wade's Wire. To receive these posts via email when they are posted (no more than one a day on average), click here.

+++

Right to Employment Moves Forward
By Wade Lee Hudson, February 6, 2014

A standing-room-only crowd of 75 at a Capitol Hill forum on “Employment: A Human Right” provided a step forward in what may become a full employment movement. As reflected in my transcript of the answers to the moderator’s question on human rights, the five economists on the forum’s panel largely supported the proposition that access to decent jobs can and should be a human right....

+++

Survey Report: The Personal, the Social, and the Political
By Wade Lee Hudson, February 10, 2014

After tabulating and reviewing the responses to “The Personal, the Social, and the Political: A Survey,” it seems we have an experienced, knowledgeable group of individuals who can learn from one another about how to describe and structure group activities that enable participants to deepen and improve their personal growth, community building, and political action....

+++

The Problem with Activists
By Wade Lee Hudson, February 12, 2014

Like the rest of our society, most activist organizations get wrapped up in facts and figures and policy prescriptions, and fail to affirm underlying moral values. They rely on tapping anger and fear, and neglect deeper feelings of love and faith. They aim to score victories by defeating opponents, rather than seeking win-win solutions. They focus on the outer world and ignore the inner world. They operate too much in the head, not enough in the heart. They become excessively task-oriented, and forget to evaluate their process and how their members relate to each other. They overlook the need to empower people. They primarily rely on mobilizing people to take some specific action, rather than collective problem solving. They often have hidden agendas. They spend too much time calculating what is “political,” rather than speaking honestly. They may “listen” to people when they first recruit them, but then stop really listening. They lecture, often with a shrill tone, and try to “educate,” rather than engaging in authentic dialog. They aim to persuade, and stop learning. They are too arrogant and judgmental, rather than humble and understanding. They function like an impersonal machine that uses people until they use them up. They manipulate people by stroking their egos. They are afflicted with self-centered power struggles. They tend to believe that some one person must always be in charge, that each person must either dominate or submit, rather than collaborate as equals. They have too many boring meetings. They don’t sing and dance enough. They don’t enjoy enough cultural experiences together. They don’t just hang out and socialize informally enough. They are too serious. They don’t have enough fun. They forget to love the universe and the life force that energizes and structures it.

+++

Reflections on the Battle of Baghdad
By Wade Lee Hudson, February 14, 2014

Following is the slightly edited commentary that I wrote on April 14,  2003 as I waited in Amman, Jordan to return to the States after serving with the Iraq Peace Team during the invasion and occupation of Baghdad....

+++

Building a Full Employment Movement: Options for Action (2/14/14 Draft)
By Wade Lee Hudson, February 15, 2014

NOTE: I recently sent the following to associates working on the full employment issue. It prompted the exchange with Joel Segal that is included in the Comments section below. Later, Joel circulated ”Building A National Multiracial and Multi-issue Progressive Congress,” which I will post separately....

+++

Building A Multiracial and Multi-issue Progressive Congress
By Joel Segal, February 15, 2014

...After working in Congress for 13 years, city government for 10 years, and state government for 3 years, I believe that the only realistic way to move forward in building a new America with shared prosperity, health care, jobs, and housing for all, guaranteed economic security and a sustainable environment, is through a united multiracial movement and coalition like the African National Congress, Solidarity in Poland, SNCC, SDS, and the SCLC in the 1960′s....

+++

Join the Club
By Wade Lee Hudson, February 15, 2014

On reflection, it strikes me that my use of the word “club” in “Building a Full Employment Movement: Options for Action (2/14/14 Draft)” was likely influenced unconsciously by my reading of Join the Club: How Peer Pressure Can Transform the World, by Tina Rosenberg (April 23, 2012). The book addresses personal, social, and political change.

Highlights from Wade's Wire

Following are links to some of the posts that I made to Wade's Wire recently, to which I post no more than one item each day. To subscribe to Wade's Wire and receive all of the posts quickly via email, click here.

+++++

Wade’s Journal
by Wade Lee Hudson

When I fly to Phoenix February 25, I’ll be ready. I’m loving it here. I feel happier than I’ve ever been for a sustained period of time. I’m better able to speak my truth and do what I think is right.

+++++

“Employment: A Human Right” – A Partial Transcript
by Wade Lee Hudson

On February 5, 2014, Congresspersons John Conyers Jr. and Frederica Wilson, co-chairs of the newly formed, first ever Congressional Full Employment Caucus hosted a forum on “Employment: A Human Right.” The forum was moderated by Christina Bellantoni, Roll Call Editor-in-Chief. A video of the forum is available for viewing at http://www.dems.gov/photos-videos/. At 38:09, Bellantoni asks, “Can access to decent jobs really be a human right?” Following are the responses from the panel, which consisted of Phillip Harvey, Lawrence Mishel, Thea Lee, Dean Baker, and John Cavanagh.

+++++

Petition Video: Interview with Wade Lee Hudson

This 2:52 minute video offers reasons why people should sign the Guarantee Living-Wage Job Opportunities petition. Produced by James Pace-Cornsilk, it includes striking images and a soundtrack with music and an interview with Wade Lee Hudson. You can invite friends to watch it by referring them to this link:

+++++

How to make your project more open collaborative

by opencollaboration

Here are questions to think about to make your project more open collaborative:

+++++

Reunion with the Martinez Family

Today I returned to the mountains 90 minutes from Las Terrenas looking for the wonderful Martinez family who hosted me in 1988. I only had their names and the name of the nearest town. I drove up into the mountains to the general area they had lived, as I remembered it, and stopped at the first store....

The Personal, the Social, and the Political: A Survey (1/25/13 Draft)

My plan is to post a questionnaire like the following on Survey Monkey and widely circulate an invitation for people to complete it. The intent is to find and connect with others who share an interest in what I tentatively, for lack of a better word for now, call “holistic organizing.” The basic idea is to nurture the development of supportive communities whose members support each other in their self-development, their efforts to grow alternative communities that can serve as “models” for the future, and their political efforts to help improve public policies.

I may begin distributing this Wednesday, January 29. If you have any suggested changes or words of encouragement, that would be appreciated. And if you think it’s a bad idea, please let me know that as well.

Thanks,
Wade

++++++++++++++

NOTE: The questions will be followed by:
___Yes ___No ___Not sure       Comments:

+++++

The Personal, the Social, and the Political: A Survey

(1/25/13 Draft)

Introduction

This 14-question survey is intended to explore attitudes and activities concerning personal growth, community development, and political action.

The questions only ask for yes-or-no answers. Completing the survey will probably take less than five minutes.

Responses will be kept anonymous unless otherwise indicated.

A report on the results will be shared with all respondents who ask to receive it.

Respondents will be invited to participate in an online discussion and/or video call about the results.

+++++

The Survey

MUTUAL SUPPORT

Do you have close friends with whom you:
• Feel free to be yourself
• Have fun
• Express deep feelings
• Listen carefully
• Give and receive support
• Get to know each other
• Share happiness
• Discuss the meaning of life
• Evaluate what’s right and what’s wrong
• Help each other become better human beings
• And consider how to improve governmental policies and social institutions?

If you do not have those kind of close friends, would you like to?

If you do have those kind of close friends, do you occasionally gather as a group to engage in those kind of activities together?

PERSONAL GROWTH

In the last month, have you, in one way or another, tried to become a better human being?

During the next month, do you plan to try to become a better human being?

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

In the last month, have you tried to help improve a social institution (or organization), such as a spiritual community, your child’s school, a neighborhood center, or an informal community of friends?

During the next month, do you plan to help improve a social institution or informal community?

POLITICAL ACTION

In the last month, have you engaged in an effort to impact public policy?

During the next month, do you plan to engage in an effort to impact public policy?

FOLLOW-UP

Would you be interested in participating in an online discussion and/or a video call about these questions with others who answer this survey?

If you don’t already, would you like to gather at least once a month with close, trusted friends to share a meal, socialize informally, and hear what others have to say about the kind of questions posed in this survey?

Will you tell others about this survey?

May we identify you as the author of your comments?

Would you like to receive a report on the results of this survey?

Name / Email (we won’t share your email address)

Wade's Wire Highlights

Following are links to some of the posts that I made to Wade's Wire recently, to which I post no more than one item each day. To subscribe to Wade's Wire and receive the posts via email, click here, fill out the "Follow Blog via Email" form at the top left, and reply to the autoreply email to verify.

+++

Poverty in Las Terrenas

These six photos reflect the poverty that afflicts the Dominican Republic, even in the relatively prosperous tourist town of Las Terrenas.

+++

Thoreau: Emerson’s Eulogy

When Thoreau died in 1862, Emerson was a national figure, the Great American Philosopher. Thoreau was a minor, local personality. Emerson’s funeral oration … give[s] his views, positive and negative, of this one-time disciple who has now eclipsed him in stature.
From Appreciation, An Essay by Ralph Waldo Emerson

+++

In Bed with Wall Street

In Bed with Wall Street: The Conspiracy Crippling Our Global Economy, the book by Larry Doyle,  a former mortgage-backed securities trader, is receiving a strong, early reception. In its first week, each of four Amazon.com reviewers gave it five stars and posted glowing reviews.

On Jan 7, 2014, C-SPAN presented a compelling, accessible 40-minute Book Discussion with Doyle.  Watch and weep. I did.

+++

The Trouble With Full Employment

By  Philip Harvey
Presentation at Conference on An Economic Bill of Rights for the 21st Century
Columbia University, Oct. 18, 2013

+++

Bubbles, the Multiverse, and Humility

A quote.

+++

Ronald Dworkin on Law, Morality, and Economics

The New York Review of Books continues to be my favorite magazine. It’s the only one I read regularly. Their 50th anniversary issue  was particularly rewarding. In that issue, they published “several essays on or by writers and artists whose work meant something to us when we started.” One of these essays was “Law from the Inside Out” by Ronald Dworkin, in which he reflected on the development of his thinking from the very concrete to the abstract. This progression led him to integrate “concrete legal issues, questions of personal ethics and morality, broad political issues of social policy, and the most abstract, rarefied philosophical and metaphysical puzzles.” His conclusion was that these issues are interconnected and cannot be separated.

The Human Right to a Decent Job

By Wade Lee Hudson

Most Americans agree. As a society, we should see to it that everyone who wants to work can find a living-wage job opportunity. When we establish that foundation of economic security for all, everyone will benefit. Securing this human right is our moral obligation.

Pope Francis may inspire a widespread moral renewal that prompts business owners to pay better wages. The wealthy may someday donate enough money to non-profit organizations to hire everyone who needs a decent job. Until we witness that change of heart, however, the federal government must help.

As citizens, we need not prescribe exactly how the government should assure genuine full employment. The experts can figure that out. Our job is to keep pushing them until they do it. But we can suggest some options.

Without increasing the deficit, we can minimize problems associated with “big government” by distributing federal revenue-sharing funds for public-service jobs to local governments, where citizens can monitor and influence how the money is spent. The jobs created can be regular, permanent jobs that provide needed services, like child care, substance abuse programs, in-home caregiving, and improving our parks – not temporary “make work” positions or jobs only for people who meet certain qualifications. Priority can be given to entry-level jobs in the $12-16 per hour range in order to maximize the number of people who gain employment.

A sales tax on Wall Street speculation can raise $100 billion or more annually, which would also discourage dangerous, unproductive gambling. In addition, we can close loopholes that allow corporations to hide profits offshore, and transfer funds from wasteful military spending. Creating jobs will boost the economy and generate additional tax revenue, which we can use to create more jobs. Savings from reduced food stamp and unemployment insurance payments will also be available.

By steadily increasing funding each year, local governments can prepare for how to use the money, and the governments involved can better deal with any problems that develop. The size of the grants can be based in part on local unemployment rates. Cities and towns with more unemployment will receive more. We can insist that local governments not use the money to replace their current programs and reduce their own taxes.

We can’t guarantee everyone a job, but we can guarantee everyone a living-wage job opportunity.  We can insist that supervisors assure that their employees are reliable and work hard. They owe their workers and the taxpayer nothing less. And if good jobs are available we shouldn’t give tax money to people who are able but unwilling to work.

Not every unemployed individual will take advantage of these opportunities. Some people will first have to deal with substance abuse, helped by knowing a meaningful job awaits them when they get their act together. Other individuals will rely on friends, family, or charity. But almost everyone who wants to work will put in a solid effort if given the chance. And everyone has some useful skill.

When we achieve true full employment, those who are worried about food stamps fostering dependency can rest assured that we are supporting self-determination. Business owners will gain from a more prosperous economy. Everyone will benefit from living in a more harmonious, safer society. People formerly living in poverty will be able to make ends meet, which will greatly improve the quality of their lives. Most workers will: 1) benefit from higher wages (because employers will pay more to keep trained employees); 2) be treated with more respect by employers (because workers will have more choices), and; 3) have more leisure time to relax with their families, enjoy their lives, and contribute to their community.

A common argument against full employment is that it would cause excessive inflation. But most efforts to increase employment have relied on deficit spending, which can be inflationary, and a jobs program can be funded without increasing the deficit. Increased global competition makes inflation less likely. In recent decades, when unemployment decreased, inflation did not increase. A public-service jobs program will have less inflationary impact than boosting private-sector employment. Funds will disproportionately go to areas with higher unemployment, which means less inflationary pressure. And so long as wages and Social Security payments increase to compensate, modest inflation is not a problem for most people.

The federal government has created unemployment and poverty on purpose, in the name of preventing inflation. But those actions are a moral outrage. If and when inflation becomes a problem, we can deal with it some other way.

In the meantime, let’s help our society live up to its highest ideals, “promote the general welfare,” and support “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

+++

Wade Lee Hudson a community organizer and part-time cab driver in San Francisco is author of the Guarantee Living-Wage Job Opportunities petition. Please consider signing it.

Guarantee Living-Wage Jobs (plus more)

Please sign and share the Guarantee Living-wage Jobs petition. It is addressed to “activist organizations” and reads:

We urge you to work together to persuade the government in Washington to see to it that everyone who wants to work can find a living-wage job.

To sign the petition, click here.

I’ve launched this campaign with valuable assistance from the economist Dean Baker and the Internet strategist Michael Stein.

For more information, you can review the campaign’s website and read “Guarantee Living-Wage Jobs: A Call for Action.”

I consider this effort very important and timely, so I hope you support it.

+++++++

I’m posting one item each day to Wade’s Wire. To subscribe and receive those posts via email, click here. Following is some information about recent posts there:

PopularResistance.org: An Evaluation

My evaluation of that website, which was prompted by a recent newsletter. It prompted the following exchange with Margaret Flowers, one of the sites editors:

Thanks for checking out the website. If you want to know who we are, our names are on the articles we write, which you cited. And there is a list of contributors on the “About” page. 

There is more to our strategy than what you’ve read, so I wouldn’t jump to conclusions. We advocate for participatory democracy, not top-down strategies. We highlight groups that are on the ground doing work to challenge the system. 

As far as reforms go, we personally celebrate those victories but also encourage people to recognize that we mustn’t stop at partial steps. We must keep pushing until policies reflect the desires and needs of the people. That means shifting the balance of power. Of course the situation is more complex than what we can include in our weekly newsletter. 

PopularResistance.org is a website that provides information and tools for people to get engaged in ways that work for them. We do support and organize campaigns that fit into the strategy (one currently is focused on the TPP). If we had more resources, there is much more we would offer, but this is what we can offer for now. We hope that you find it of some value.

My reply:

Thanks for the clarification, Margaret. Given the fact that you’re doing so much good work, it’s reassuring to hear that you do celebrate partial victories, for as I discussed, that matter was not clear to me due to the passages that I quoted. I agree with how you formulate the need to keep them within the context of the need to keep pushing. 

My comment about transparency was in reference to the administrators, or editors, of the website. Who decides what is published, including the content of “Our Mission” and “Our Philosophy” on the About page? I recommend that those individuals be identified on the About page. 

I agree that our situation is complex, but I believe that concise statements of core beliefs, such as your “Our Philosophy,” need to be as accurate as possible and I do not believe it as accurate to say that large transnational corporations control our social system. A system consists of interdependent elements. No one element controls a system. You can read more about my thoughts on this issue in Our Vision: Transforming the System (12/26/11 Draft) 

Thanks much for your good work, which I follow and respect. It’s just that some of that newsletter provoked me. Take care, Wade

++

Bubbles, the Multiverse, and Humility

“Bubbles form in the expanding universe, each developing into a big or small bang, perhaps each with different values for what we usually call the constants of nature. The inhabitants (if any) of one bubble cannot observe other bubbles, so to them their bubble appears as the whole universe. The whole assembly of all these universes has come to be called the ‘multiverse.’”

from Physics: What We Do and Don’t Know 
By Steven Weinberg

++

Ronald Dworkin on Law, Morality, and Economics

My essay about a remarkable summary of Dworkin's intellectual development, written by Dworkin..

++

On Electronic Eavesdropping 

A quote by Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg, who was appointed to the District of Columbia Circuit by President Ronald Reagan:

A person who knows all of another’s travels can deduce whether he is a weekly churchgoer, a heavy drinker, a regular at the gym, an unfaithful husband, an outpatient receiving medical treatment, an associate of particular individuals or political groups — and not just one fact about a person, but all such facts.

++

Thoughts for the New Year

Posted on New Year's Day, following a wonderful party the night before (check out the photo!)

++

Reflections on 2013

My spontaneous thoughts looking back.

Gearing Up for the New Year

I wonder: What day will be best to launch a new project? I want to ride the wave of enthusiasm that the New Year brings in, but I don’t want to try to engage people while they’re still wasted. Options are: Thur., Jan 2; Fri., Jan 3; Sat. Jan. 4, or; some later date. What do you think?

Having been out of the country during the holidays, I’ve missed the festivities, but the peace and quiet has enabled me to be productive. Maybe even creative. But as Julia Cameron says in The Artist’s Way: A Spiritual Path to Higher Creativity, it’s best to just do the work and leave the quality to God!

In response to “New Projects for 2014,” a young Australian who’s often offered me valuable feedback, Yahya Abdal-Aziz, commented:

Happy holidays! 

Yes, yes and yes!  I like what you're about, about now.  Maybe you needed a little distance (from the US) to be able to see more clearly? 

…The questionnaire is too long; it has too many questions.  I suggest rewriting it at about one-third or one-quarter the length.  Then it wouldn't be too daunting a task to give you some useful input in, say, 5 to 15 minutes.

As for your "personal-political support" or "holistic support" circles, I think you'll find the first name too unwieldy and the second carrying too much baggage ...  How about something simpler, say "growth ring"?  That one also evokes the metaphor of a sturdy tree growing steadily through the years, potentially into a formidable giant.

I think your goal of establishing such circles of trusted friends is achievable.  However, please don't make it feel like a major life commitment to join in the fun and camaraderie.  Our members won't be joining a monastic order, will they?  (Possibly an "intentional community," just the same.)  Consider such "fraternal" organisations as Rotary and Lions clubs, and even some lodges: they meet monthly for a meal and company, devise and promote useful projects within their community and overseas, and engender many long-lasting friendships and commitments.  They may be a fruitful model AND starting-point for creating fully transformative "growth rings".

I replied:

I agree the survey was too long. I've shortened it, but it may still be too long. I include it at the end of this email. If you can give me more feedback, I'd appreciate it. 

I like your reference to the Rotary and Lions clubs and agree that such efforts should not demand too much and should include fun. 

I agree that both "personal-political support" or "holistic support" are problematic. However, the women's movement used "consciousness raising groups" and that phrase is somewhat unwieldy too. One argument for "personal-political support circle" is that it may better describe what is distinctive about this idea. 

Your "growth ring" is intriguing. What about "growth circle"? Here are the options so far:

• Personal-political support circle.
• Holistic support circle.
• Holistic circle.
• Growth ring.
• Growth circle.
• Growth group.

Other ideas?

Your comments, dear subscriber, would be appreciated as well.

And if you want me to visit you during my April/May road trip throughout the States so we can have a cup of tea and a soulful conversation face-to-face about whatever is on our mind at that time, please let me know.