Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Reflections on West Lake Tahoe

Today, after living in Northern California for more than 50 years, I more fully appreciated the unadulterated beauty of Lake Tahoe. I may have landed here at the perfect time, late April, and best location, Tahoma, on the West Shore.

After clearing what feels like the last major hurdle on my autobiography – completely a good first draft on the final, most important chapter, “Reflections,” in which I acknowledge my mistakes, share my conclusions about key points in my worldview, and look forward to the future – I decided to celebrate by firing up one of the Dominican cigars I brought with me and stroll to the pier across from the post office.

Sitting on a bench at the end of the pier in the sun without a cloud in the sky with the temperature at a comfortably 54 degrees, intoxicated a bit by the tobacco, I gazed on the lake with its various shades of blue in almost complete solitude. No speedboats disturbed the peace and quiet, which will soon no longer be the case. In fact, none were within eyesight. To my right and left, several piers in each direction were empty, except for one person in the far distance. One individual was sitting on the steps in front of her cabin about 150 yards away. I could see two gardeners clearing the land around the three tiers of cabins nearby. Otherwise, I was alone and loving it, reinforcing my plan to travel throughout the Western United States in a converted van next winter. Driving through Nevada to get here I was struck once again by the beautiful enormity of this country. I can find more solitude here than I can by traveling almost anywhere else, except maybe Australia (not a bad idea).

Mother Nature is indeed a wonder to behold. How unfortunate that city dwellers so seldom are able to be healed by communing directly with Her magic, without being distracted by human interaction.

Earlier today I was heartened to read an article on The New York Times, which I found by noticing that it was the “most emailed” article. (I should look at this list more often, because when I do, I usually find a real gem, as I did with “Raising a Moral Child" and "All or Nothing Marriage," for the "wisdom of crowds" is a fact.

Today’s article was “What Does Buddhism Require?”, an interview with Jay L. Garfield, who has taught philosophy at several universities and is currently the Kwan Im Thong Hood Cho Temple Professor of Humanities, Yale-NUS College in Singapore. He is at work on a book called “Engaging Buddhism: Why Buddhism Matters to Contemporary Philosophy.”

For some time, in conversations with friends about the Buddhist belief that "there is no self or soul," I have argued that what has been meant by that expression is that there is no separate self with boundaries. Rather, the self is without boundary and is interwoven with other selves and all of reality. But I had never seen any such written explanation. So I was reassured that Garfield articulated that understanding in much the same way with the following statements:
A strong sense of self — of one’s own substantial reality, uniqueness and independence of others — may not be psychologically or morally healthy. It can lead to egoism, to narcissism and to a lack of care for others.... More positively, the Buddhist tradition encourages us to see ourselves as impermanent, interdependent individuals, linked to one another and to our world through shared commitments to achieving an understanding of our lives and a reduction of suffering. It encourages us to rethink egoism and to consider an orientation to the world characterized by care and joint responsibility.
My mood has also been boosted by a decision to finally bite the bullet and buy a new laptop (it should be delivered to me here Thursday). Getting a telephone call from Microsoft Support that informed me how to install Word 2013 without buying it again helped get me over that hump.

I also feel good about my decision about how to handle my ambivalence about writing about people who are still alive with whom I have experienced conflict without giving them a chance to correct the record or offer a rebuttal. I plan to hold off on distributing the first edition of my autobiography to the general public. Rather, I will make it available only to those people I write about, plus some consultants and perhaps to my blog subscribers who promise not to distribute it widely to others. Then, I’ll incorporate feedback into the second edition if there is one. I’m trying my best to be accurate, fair, and considerate in what I say about others, but it’s a delicate matter, so I feel good about this approach. Nevertheless. I’m still welcome to suggested changes in this plan.

The controversy about the racist Clippers’ owner’s comments is also encouraging. Exposing the enduring reality of racism and affirming the need to address it is always a positive development.

And just now my neighbor here connected a cable to my TV so I’ll be able to watch the Giants and Warriors on a large HD screen rather than trying to find some way to stream them on my laptop. Life is good!

2 comments:

  1. [This comment is on your PREVIOUS item - due to a technical fault, blogspot is not letting me reply there]

    Wade wrote:
    "[various things] have prompted me to coin a new title, Opposing the System to Save the World: My Story. ... I’m moving toward that title because [conversations] reinforce my confidence that my analysis of our social system, as I expressed for example in 'Transforming the System with Evolutionary Revolution,' is sensible."

    Dan Brook replied, writing that he wished to "constructively encourage you to go further." He points out that (almost 30 years ago) the influential book "Liberating Theory" by a raft of sociologists - systems thinkers par excellence! - expressed similar understandings to yours, in e.g. the concept of "complementary holism". This asserts that: "reality's many parts always act together to form an entwined whole" and "the parts which compose wholes interrelate to help define one another."
    ... (more)

    ReplyDelete
  2. What's distinctive about your viewpoint (I neither know nor care whether you originated it!) is your emphasis on *avoiding scapegoating*. On this, you offer a better alternative:

    "We need a positive, creative vision with which we can inspire others and ourselves to be more active to help change the system by changing ourselves, our culture, and our institutions – and creating new structures that help us better serve humanity."

    I can't endorse your views on scapegoating strongly enough! In my youthful attempts to change the world through engagement in political movements, I was constantly frustrated by the determination of every orator to sheet home the blame for all off society's ills on a select, privileged minority. While this approach works very well as demagoguery, fosters racial and class hatreds that typically erupt in violence that may even escalate to genocidal and fratricidal wars - witness the French Revolution and Biafra, to name just two examples - and lets the rest of us avoid inspecting our own contributions to misery, it utterly fails to help us transform society in an ongoing peaceful and cooperative endeavour. The only way forward lies in our strong determination that we will refuse the easy path of blaming others - for anything, ever. Doing so short-circuits the urge to punish or seek revenge (and, among other benefits, might help reduce prison populations); and leaves us with more energy to "fight the good fight". What is that fight? Not to beat down, mutilate or kill an external opponent! No, it is to conquer our *own* impulses that lead to destroying both self and others. Our "struggle", our "jihad", must always be, first and foremost, to grow in understanding, wisdom and power so that we may, together with our communities, act every day and at all times to achieve great and good things for the benefit of all. On such an understanding of "struggle", both Christians ("Onward, Christian soldiers!") and Muslims (who are always engaged in a personal "jihad", and whose faith teaches them to encourage others to study their own scriptures and follow their own faiths) can agree. Maybe Buddhists and others can, too; Marxists probably cannot. ;-)

    Hope I haven't rambled too much! But I love your emphasis on transformation, your incessant search for wisdom, and your appreciation that we all achieve more together than in opposition. That's why I think you should NOT call anything you do "Opposing the system"; rather, call it "Opposing ignorance" if you must, but surely a title that represents you better is "Transforming the system from within". And considering the manifold changes that your life has taken you through, I doubt you could have a better title for a book about your own life than "Transformations".

    Well, I finally got to the point of this reply! - and incidentally, finally answered your call for suggestions for a title. Sorry I can't think fast enough to meet your schedule - I know you're in a hurry to get to the 70th party and the first distribution, and you've probably fixed on the title by now. But personally, I will always think of your story as one of inspiring transformation.

    ReplyDelete